Agent readiness is not an AI feature.
It is a structural property of a system.
A system is agent ready when non-human actors can act through it safely, predictably, and without interpretation.
If a human must infer intent, guess behaviour, or recover from ambiguity, the system is not agent ready.
The Core Rule
Agents require clarity, not intelligence.
They do not reason around gaps.
They execute within constraints.
Structural Requirements
An agent-ready system provides:
- Explicit inputs Actions are named, scoped, and versioned.
- Deterministic transformations The same input produces the same outcome, every time.
- Verifiable outputs Results are structured, observable, and auditable.
- Clear authority boundaries Who is acting, what they are allowed to do, and what they are forbidden to do is unambiguous.
- Enforced constraints Guardrails exist by design, not convention.
When these are present, agents become reliable operators rather than uncontrolled actors.
What This Is Not
Agent readiness is not:
- a chat interface
- an AI layer
- MCP support alone
- automation bolted onto a human-first system
Those may use an agent-ready system. They do not create one.
Why This Matters
We are shifting from systems that assist humans
to systems that act on their behalf.
Without agent readiness:
- behaviour becomes brittle
- safety is retrofitted
- trust erodes
With it:
- autonomy is bounded
- feedback loops are intact
- systems remain governable as complexity increases
Vault Position
Agent readiness is architectural hygiene.
Not optional.
Not a trend.
Not negotiable.
Design the system so agents can operate cleanly – or expect disorder to scale faster than capability.
